Aembit vs NewCore for non-human identities

SHORT ANSWER

On our weights for non-human identities, Aembit scores 7.0 / 10 and NewCore 6.7 / 10. Aembit scores higher on removing long-lived secrets; and maturity and buying clarity; NewCore scores higher on discovery breadth, owner for every identity and AI agents as non-human identities. They score the same on runtime enforcement.

Editorial assessment · Desk research from public vendor material · Reviewed 2026-09-29

Scores by criterion

C1Discovery breadth25%
Aembit
4Gap in public material

Built to issue access, not to search for existing keys; discovery of existing secrets is not described.

Source: Aembit

NewCore
5Gap in public material

Discovery covers people, agents, systems and apps across Okta, AWS, Microsoft, BambooHR, Salesforce and Google. Code repositories and vaults are not listed.

Source: NewCore: Identity Discovery

Higher score: NewCore

C2Owner for every identity15%
Aembit
6Gap in public material

Blended Identity ties agent access to the human operating it; ownership of other workloads is not described.

Source: Aembit: IAM for agentic AI

NewCore
8

Ties every agent action to an accountable human or team.

Source: NewCore: Agent Guardian

Higher score: NewCore

C3Removing long-lived secrets25%
Aembit
9

Secretless access: credentials are delivered just in time, per task.

Source: Aembit

NewCore
7

Replaces standing credentials with short-lived, scoped ones for agents; the same claim is not made for existing service accounts.

Source: NewCore: Agent Guardian

Higher score: Aembit

C4Runtime enforcement15%
Aembit
8

Conditional access policies evaluated at request time, including security posture.

Source: Aembit

NewCore
8

Per-call policy for agents, with the option to end a single path.

Source: NewCore: Agent Guardian

Higher score: Tie

C5AI agents as non-human identities10%
Aembit
8

Covers AI agents and MCP servers through its MCP Identity Gateway.

Source: Aembit: IAM for agentic AI

NewCore
9

Treats on-behalf-of, delegated and autonomous agents as first-class identities.

Source: NewCore home page

Higher score: NewCore

C6Maturity and buying clarity10%
Aembit
8

Free-forever tier; states SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001:2022.

Source: Aembit · Aembit: IAM for agentic AI

NewCore
4

Launched June 2026; no pricing or named customers.

Source: NewCore launch release (PR Newswire)

Higher score: Aembit

Weighted total

Aembit 7.0 / 10 · NewCore 6.7 / 10

Higher score: Aembit

Where each one scores higher

Aembit scores higher on

  • removing long-lived secrets (9 vs 7)
  • maturity and buying clarity (8 vs 4)

NewCore scores higher on

  • discovery breadth (4 vs 5)
  • owner for every identity (6 vs 8)
  • AI agents as non-human identities (8 vs 9)

Pricing, side by side

Aembit

Free-forever tier. Paid plan prices are not on the pages reviewed.

Source: Aembit

As published on 2026-09-29.

Visit Aembit

NewCore

Not published, contact sales.

Source: NewCore home page

As published on 2026-09-29.

Visit NewCore

Which should you choose?

Choose Aembit if removing long-lived secrets and runtime enforcement matter most. It scores 9 and 8 on them. Secretless access: credentials are delivered just in time, per task.

Choose NewCore if AI agents as non-human identities and owner for every identity matter most. It scores 9 and 8 on them. Treats on-behalf-of, delegated and autonomous agents as first-class identities.

Questions

Which scores higher overall, Aembit or NewCore?

On our weights for non-human identities, Aembit scores 7.0 / 10 and NewCore 6.7 / 10. Totals are the weighted average of six criterion scores; the weights are listed on the Non-human identities page.

Where does Aembit score higher than NewCore?

On removing long-lived secrets; and maturity and buying clarity.

Where does NewCore score higher than Aembit?

On discovery breadth, owner for every identity and AI agents as non-human identities.

Related

Sources