CyberArk Secrets Manager vs Entro Security for non-human identities
SHORT ANSWER
Editorial assessment · Desk research from public vendor material · Reviewed 2026-09-29
Scores by criterion
Manages the secrets it holds and syncs with AWS Secrets Manager and Azure Key Vault through Secrets Hub; broad discovery is not the focus.
Source: CyberArk secrets management
Searches clouds, code, CI/CD, on-prem and collaboration tools, including Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, GitHub, GitLab, Kubernetes, Jenkins, Slack and ServiceNow.
Source: Entro Security
Higher score: Entro Security
Ownership mapping is not described on the page reviewed.
Source: CyberArk secrets management
Higher score: Entro Security
Centrally rotates and manages credentials for applications, DevOps tools and pipelines.
Source: CyberArk secrets management
Rotation, vaulting and just-in-time access are listed; the emphasis is on finding and tracking secrets.
Source: Entro Security
Higher score: CyberArk Secrets Manager
Controls how applications fetch secrets; behavioral blocking is not described.
Source: CyberArk secrets management
Detects abuse in real time through its NHIDR engine; inline blocking is not described.
Source: Entro Security · Entro: AI agents
Higher score: Entro Security
AI agents are not mentioned on the page reviewed.
Source: CyberArk secrets management
Higher score: Entro Security
SaaS, self-hosted and open-source (Conjur) options; named overall leader in KuppingerCole's 2025 Leadership Compass for enterprise secrets management.
Source: CyberArk secrets management
Pricing and certifications are not on the pages reviewed.
Source: Entro Security
Higher score: CyberArk Secrets Manager
Weighted total
CyberArk Secrets Manager 5.8 / 10 · Entro Security 7.3 / 10
Higher score: Entro Security
Where each one scores higher
CyberArk Secrets Manager scores higher on
- removing long-lived secrets (8 vs 6)
- maturity and buying clarity (9 vs 5)
Entro Security scores higher on
- discovery breadth (5 vs 9)
- owner for every identity (4 vs 9)
- runtime enforcement (5 vs 6)
- AI agents as non-human identities (3 vs 8)
Pricing, side by side
CyberArk Secrets Manager
Not on the page reviewed. Conjur is available as open source.
Source: CyberArk secrets management
As published on 2026-09-29.
Which should you choose?
Choose CyberArk Secrets Manager if maturity and buying clarity and removing long-lived secrets matter most. It scores 9 and 8 on them. SaaS, self-hosted and open-source (Conjur) options; named overall leader in KuppingerCole's 2025 Leadership Compass for enterprise secrets management.
Choose Entro Security if discovery breadth and owner for every identity matter most. It scores 9 and 9 on them. Searches clouds, code, CI/CD, on-prem and collaboration tools, including Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, GitHub, GitLab, Kubernetes, Jenkins, Slack and ServiceNow.
Questions
Which scores higher overall, CyberArk Secrets Manager or Entro Security?
On our weights for non-human identities, Entro Security scores 7.3 / 10 and CyberArk Secrets Manager 5.8 / 10. Totals are the weighted average of six criterion scores; the weights are listed on the Non-human identities page.
Where does CyberArk Secrets Manager score higher than Entro Security?
On removing long-lived secrets; and maturity and buying clarity.
Where does Entro Security score higher than CyberArk Secrets Manager?
On discovery breadth, owner for every identity, runtime enforcement and AI agents as non-human identities.
Related
- CyberArk Secrets Manager alternatives
- Entro Security alternatives
- Compare CyberArk Secrets Manager, Entro Security and others
- Re-weight this topic in the calculator
- Non-human identities
- CyberArk Secrets Manager vs Oasis Security
- Aembit vs CyberArk Secrets Manager
- CyberArk Secrets Manager vs Silverfort
- CyberArk Secrets Manager vs NewCore
Sources
- CyberArk secrets management: https://www.cyberark.com/products/secrets-management/
- Entro Security: https://entro.security/
- Entro: AI agents: https://entro.security/platform-ai-agents/