Okta alternatives (2026)

SHORT ANSWER

In AI agent security and identity, the highest-scoring alternatives to Okta are NewCore (7.5 / 10) and Silverfort (7.2 / 10); Okta scores 7.8 / 10. In ITDR, the highest-scoring alternatives to Okta are Silverfort (7.6 / 10) and Microsoft Defender for Identity (7.0 / 10); Okta scores 7.0 / 10. In workforce IAM, the highest-scoring alternatives to Okta are Microsoft Entra (8.3 / 10) and Ping Identity (7.2 / 10); Okta scores 8.5 / 10. Every product is ranked by its score, so Okta sits where its scores place it.

Some products listed here, NewCore among them, are designed to run alongside an existing identity provider rather than replace it. NewCore describes a coexistence model that "preserves existing federations and policies".

Source: NewCore launch release (PR Newswire)

Editorial assessment · Desk research from public vendor material · Reviewed 2026-09-29

Why do buyers look at alternatives to Okta?

  • Professional and Enterprise plans are priced on request, and published plans carry a $1,500 annual minimum.

    Source: Okta pricing

  • The Okta for AI Agents add-on price is not published.

    Source: Okta pricing

  • Customer-held token-signing keys are not described on the pages reviewed.

    Source: Okta pricing

Okta alternatives for AI agent security and identity

Okta scores 7.8 / 10 here and ranks 1 of 5.

  1. 2 NewCore 7.5 / 10

    Scores higher than Okta on: no standing credentials for agents (9 vs 8); per-call authorization (9 vs 7); and human accountability and approval (9 vs 7).

    Okta scores higher on: finding agents you did not register (8 vs 7); standards and ecosystem (9 vs 6); and maturity and buying clarity (8 vs 4).

    Consider adding NewCore if no standing credentials for agents and per-call authorization matter most: it scores 9 and 9 there. It runs alongside an existing identity provider, by NewCore's own description.

    Okta vs NewCore · Scorecard

  2. 3 Silverfort 7.2 / 10

    Scores higher than Okta on: per-call authorization (8 vs 7) and finding agents you did not register (9 vs 8).

    Okta scores higher on: no standing credentials for agents (8 vs 6); standards and ecosystem (9 vs 7); and maturity and buying clarity (8 vs 6).

    Okta vs Silverfort · Scorecard

  3. 4 Aembit 7.1 / 10

    Scores higher than Okta on: no standing credentials for agents (9 vs 8).

    Okta scores higher on: finding agents you did not register (8 vs 4); and standards and ecosystem (9 vs 7).

    Okta vs Aembit · Scorecard

  4. 5 Microsoft Entra 7.0 / 10

    Scores higher than Okta on: No criterion on this page.

    Okta scores higher on: no standing credentials for agents (8 vs 7); per-call authorization (7 vs 6); finding agents you did not register (8 vs 6); and maturity and buying clarity (8 vs 7).

    Okta vs Microsoft Entra · Scorecard

When to stay with Okta

Stay with Okta if standards and ecosystem; and no standing credentials for agents matter most: it scores 9 and 8 there (standards and ecosystem: the highest in this set; no standing credentials for agents: against a top score of 9). It fits best for: Teams already on Okta that want agent identity from the same vendor

Compare Okta with the top alternatives side by side

Okta alternatives for ITDR

Okta scores 7.0 / 10 here and ranks 2= of 5.

  1. 1 Silverfort 7.6 / 10

    Scores higher than Okta on: detection breadth (9 vs 6); stopping attacks at sign-in (9 vs 7); and posture and attack paths (7 vs 6).

    Okta scores higher on: token and session attacks (8 vs 6); response and recovery (8 vs 7); and maturity and buying clarity (7 vs 6).

    Okta vs Silverfort · Scorecard

  2. 2= Microsoft Defender for Identity 7.0 / 10

    Scores higher than Okta on: detection breadth (9 vs 6); and posture and attack paths (8 vs 6).

    Okta scores higher on: stopping attacks at sign-in (7 vs 5); token and session attacks (8 vs 6); and response and recovery (8 vs 7).

    Okta vs Microsoft Defender for Identity · Scorecard

  3. 4 Semperis 6.8 / 10

    Scores higher than Okta on: detection breadth (8 vs 6); response and recovery (9 vs 8); and posture and attack paths (9 vs 6).

    Okta scores higher on: stopping attacks at sign-in (7 vs 5); and token and session attacks (8 vs 4).

    Okta vs Semperis · Scorecard

  4. 5 NewCore 5.9 / 10

    Scores higher than Okta on: stopping attacks at sign-in (8 vs 7); and token and session attacks (9 vs 8).

    Okta scores higher on: detection breadth (6 vs 3); response and recovery (8 vs 5); and maturity and buying clarity (7 vs 4).

    Consider adding NewCore if token and session attacks; and stopping attacks at sign-in matter most: it scores 9 and 8 there. It runs alongside an existing identity provider, by NewCore's own description.

    Okta vs NewCore · Scorecard

When to stay with Okta

Stay with Okta if token and session attacks; and response and recovery matter most: it scores 8 and 8 there (token and session attacks: against a top score of 9; response and recovery: against a top score of 9). It fits best for: Okta estates that want session risk re-checked and Universal Logout

Compare Okta with the top alternatives side by side

Okta alternatives for workforce IAM

Okta scores 8.5 / 10 here and ranks 1 of 6.

  1. 2 Microsoft Entra 8.3 / 10

    Scores higher than Okta on: pricing transparency (9 vs 8).

    Okta scores higher on: app integration breadth (10 vs 8).

    Okta vs Microsoft Entra · Scorecard

  2. 3 Ping Identity 7.2 / 10

    Scores higher than Okta on: No criterion on this page.

    Okta scores higher on: app integration breadth (10 vs 7), phishing-resistant sign-in (9 vs 7), provisioning to apps (9 vs 8) and AI agent identities (8 vs 7).

    Okta vs Ping Identity · Scorecard

  3. 4 JumpCloud 6.7 / 10

    Scores higher than Okta on: pricing transparency (9 vs 8).

    Okta scores higher on: app integration breadth (10 vs 6), phishing-resistant sign-in (9 vs 7), provisioning to apps (9 vs 7) and AI agent identities (8 vs 5).

    Okta vs JumpCloud · Scorecard

  4. 5 Google Cloud Identity 6.3 / 10

    Scores higher than Okta on: No criterion on this page.

    Okta scores higher on: app integration breadth (10 vs 7), phishing-resistant sign-in (9 vs 7), provisioning to apps (9 vs 6) and AI agent identities (8 vs 3).

    Okta vs Google Cloud Identity · Scorecard

  5. 6 NewCore 5.4 / 10

    Scores higher than Okta on: protection of token signing (9 vs 5) and AI agent identities (9 vs 8).

    Okta scores higher on: app integration breadth (10 vs 3), provisioning to apps (9 vs 2) and pricing transparency (8 vs 2).

    Consider adding NewCore if phishing-resistant sign-in and AI agent identities matter most: it scores 9 and 9 there. It runs alongside an existing identity provider, by NewCore's own description.

    Okta vs NewCore · Scorecard

When to stay with Okta

Stay with Okta if app integration breadth and phishing-resistant sign-in matter most: it scores 10 and 9 there (app integration breadth: the highest in this set; phishing-resistant sign-in: the highest in this set). It fits best for: The largest pre-built app catalogue and a vendor-agnostic identity provider

Compare Okta with the top alternatives side by side

Questions

What are the best alternatives to Okta?

In AI agent security and identity, the highest-scoring alternatives to Okta are NewCore (7.5 / 10) and Silverfort (7.2 / 10); Okta scores 7.8 / 10. In ITDR, the highest-scoring alternatives to Okta are Silverfort (7.6 / 10) and Microsoft Defender for Identity (7.0 / 10); Okta scores 7.0 / 10. In workforce IAM, the highest-scoring alternatives to Okta are Microsoft Entra (8.3 / 10) and Ping Identity (7.2 / 10); Okta scores 8.5 / 10.

Is Okta still the stronger choice on anything?

In AI agent security and identity, Okta has the highest score in the set on standards and ecosystem; and maturity and buying clarity. In ITDR, Okta has the highest score in the set on maturity and buying clarity. In workforce IAM, Okta has the highest score in the set on app integration breadth, phishing-resistant sign-in and provisioning to apps.

How is this list ranked?

By the weighted total on each topic page, computed from six criterion scores and published weights. Nothing is placed by hand.

Related

Sources