NextGen Identity Security

Push Security vs Silverfort for identity visibility and hygiene

SHORT ANSWER

On our weights for identity visibility and hygiene, Silverfort scores 7.3 / 10 and Push Security 6.6 / 10. Push Security scores higher on hygiene findings and effort to start; Silverfort scores higher on breadth of sources; people, machines and agents in one view; and acting on findings. They score the same on maturity and buying clarity.

Editorial assessment · Desk research from public vendor material · Reviewed 2026-09-29

Scores by criterion

C1Breadth of sources25%
Push Security
6

Sees the apps and logins employees actually use, through the browser.

Source: Push Security

Silverfort
7

Identity graph and inventory across on-prem, cloud and hybrid environments.

Source: Silverfort platform · Silverfort: ITDR

Higher score: Silverfort

C2People, machines and agents in one view20%
Push Security
5

Tracks employee and agent activity in the browser; machine accounts outside the browser are out of scope.

Source: Push Security

Silverfort
8

Human, service account and AI agent identities are all covered.

Source: Silverfort: non-human identity security · Silverfort: AI agent security

Higher score: Silverfort

C3Hygiene findings20%
Push Security
8

Finds login paths that bypass SSO, unmanaged identities and missing MFA.

Source: Push Security

Silverfort
7

Access intelligence and behavioral baselines for service accounts.

Source: Silverfort platform · Silverfort: non-human identity security

Higher score: Push Security

C4Acting on findings15%
Push Security
7

In-browser guardrails push users toward MFA and stronger credentials.

Source: Push Security

Silverfort
8

Findings can be enforced inline with policies and MFA.

Source: Silverfort: ITDR · Silverfort: non-human identity security

Higher score: Silverfort

C5Effort to start10%
Push Security
8

A browser extension, with no endpoint agent; works on unmanaged devices.

Source: Push Security

Silverfort
7

States no app or code changes are needed.

Source: Silverfort platform

Higher score: Push Security

C6Maturity and buying clarity10%
Push Security
6Gap in public material

Pricing not published.

Source: Push Security

Silverfort
6Gap in public material

Pricing not published.

Source: Silverfort platform

Higher score: Tie

Weighted total

Push Security 6.6 / 10 · Silverfort 7.3 / 10

Higher score: Silverfort

Where each one scores higher

Push Security scores higher on

  • hygiene findings (8 vs 7)
  • effort to start (8 vs 7)

Silverfort scores higher on

  • breadth of sources (6 vs 7)
  • people, machines and agents in one view (5 vs 8)
  • acting on findings (7 vs 8)

Pricing, side by side

Push Security

Not published, contact sales.

Source: Push Security

As published on 2026-09-29.

Visit Push Security

Silverfort

Not published, contact sales.

Source: Silverfort platform

As published on 2026-09-29.

Visit Silverfort

Which should you choose?

Choose Push Security if hygiene findings and effort to start matter most. It scores 8 and 8 on them. Finds login paths that bypass SSO, unmanaged identities and missing MFA.

Choose Silverfort if people, machines and agents in one view and acting on findings matter most. It scores 8 and 8 on them. Human, service account and AI agent identities are all covered.

Questions

Which scores higher overall, Push Security or Silverfort?

On our weights for identity visibility and hygiene, Silverfort scores 7.3 / 10 and Push Security 6.6 / 10. Totals are the weighted average of six criterion scores; the weights are listed on the Identity visibility and hygiene page.

Where does Push Security score higher than Silverfort?

On hygiene findings and effort to start.

Where does Silverfort score higher than Push Security?

On breadth of sources; people, machines and agents in one view; and acting on findings.

Related

Sources