Push Security vs Veza for identity visibility and hygiene

SHORT ANSWER

On our weights for identity visibility and hygiene, Veza scores 7.6 / 10 and Push Security 6.6 / 10. Push Security scores higher on acting on findings and effort to start; Veza scores higher on breadth of sources; people, machines and agents in one view; and maturity and buying clarity. They score the same on hygiene findings.

Editorial assessment · Desk research from public vendor material · Reviewed 2026-09-29

Scores by criterion

C1Breadth of sources25%
Push Security
6

Sees the apps and logins employees actually use, through the browser.

Source: Push Security

Veza
9

325+ integrations across clouds, identity platforms, data systems and SaaS.

Source: Veza

Higher score: Veza

C2People, machines and agents in one view20%
Push Security
5

Tracks employee and agent activity in the browser; machine accounts outside the browser are out of scope.

Source: Push Security

Veza
8

The Access Graph unifies people, machines and third parties; AI agent visibility is listed as new.

Source: Veza

Higher score: Veza

C3Hygiene findings20%
Push Security
8

Finds login paths that bypass SSO, unmanaged identities and missing MFA.

Source: Push Security

Veza
8

Detects dormant accounts and excessive privileges.

Source: Veza

Higher score: Tie

C4Acting on findings15%
Push Security
7

In-browser guardrails push users toward MFA and stronger credentials.

Source: Push Security

Veza
5Gap in public material

Remediation from the product is not described on the page reviewed.

Source: Veza

Higher score: Push Security

C5Effort to start10%
Push Security
8

A browser extension, with no endpoint agent; works on unmanaged devices.

Source: Push Security

Veza
6Gap in public material

Integration-based; deployment effort is not stated.

Source: Veza

Higher score: Push Security

C6Maturity and buying clarity10%
Push Security
6Gap in public material

Pricing not published.

Source: Push Security

Veza
8Gap in public material

Names customers including Workday, Snowflake and Blackstone; pricing not published.

Source: Veza

Higher score: Veza

Weighted total

Push Security 6.6 / 10 · Veza 7.6 / 10

Higher score: Veza

Where each one scores higher

Push Security scores higher on

  • acting on findings (7 vs 5)
  • effort to start (8 vs 6)

Veza scores higher on

  • breadth of sources (6 vs 9)
  • people, machines and agents in one view (5 vs 8)
  • maturity and buying clarity (6 vs 8)

Pricing, side by side

Push Security

Not published, contact sales.

Source: Push Security

As published on 2026-09-29.

Visit Push Security

Veza

Not published, contact sales.

Source: Veza

As published on 2026-09-29.

Visit Veza

Which should you choose?

Choose Push Security if hygiene findings and effort to start matter most. It scores 8 and 8 on them. Finds login paths that bypass SSO, unmanaged identities and missing MFA.

Choose Veza if breadth of sources and people, machines and agents in one view matter most. It scores 9 and 8 on them. 325+ integrations across clouds, identity platforms, data systems and SaaS.

Questions

Which scores higher overall, Push Security or Veza?

On our weights for identity visibility and hygiene, Veza scores 7.6 / 10 and Push Security 6.6 / 10. Totals are the weighted average of six criterion scores; the weights are listed on the Identity visibility and hygiene page.

Where does Push Security score higher than Veza?

On acting on findings and effort to start.

Where does Veza score higher than Push Security?

On breadth of sources; people, machines and agents in one view; and maturity and buying clarity.

Related

Sources