Push Security vs Veza for identity visibility and hygiene
SHORT ANSWER
Editorial assessment · Desk research from public vendor material · Reviewed 2026-09-29
Scores by criterion
Tracks employee and agent activity in the browser; machine accounts outside the browser are out of scope.
Source: Push Security
The Access Graph unifies people, machines and third parties; AI agent visibility is listed as new.
Source: Veza
Higher score: Veza
Remediation from the product is not described on the page reviewed.
Source: Veza
Higher score: Push Security
Names customers including Workday, Snowflake and Blackstone; pricing not published.
Source: Veza
Higher score: Veza
Weighted total
Push Security 6.6 / 10 · Veza 7.6 / 10
Higher score: Veza
Where each one scores higher
Push Security scores higher on
- acting on findings (7 vs 5)
- effort to start (8 vs 6)
Veza scores higher on
- breadth of sources (6 vs 9)
- people, machines and agents in one view (5 vs 8)
- maturity and buying clarity (6 vs 8)
Pricing, side by side
Which should you choose?
Choose Push Security if hygiene findings and effort to start matter most. It scores 8 and 8 on them. Finds login paths that bypass SSO, unmanaged identities and missing MFA.
Choose Veza if breadth of sources and people, machines and agents in one view matter most. It scores 9 and 8 on them. 325+ integrations across clouds, identity platforms, data systems and SaaS.
Questions
Which scores higher overall, Push Security or Veza?
On our weights for identity visibility and hygiene, Veza scores 7.6 / 10 and Push Security 6.6 / 10. Totals are the weighted average of six criterion scores; the weights are listed on the Identity visibility and hygiene page.
Where does Push Security score higher than Veza?
On acting on findings and effort to start.
Where does Veza score higher than Push Security?
On breadth of sources; people, machines and agents in one view; and maturity and buying clarity.
Related
Sources
- Push Security: https://pushsecurity.com/
- Veza: https://veza.com/